About this Show

Piers Morgan Tonight

News/Business. (2013) New.

NETWORK
CNN

DURATION
01:00:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
San Francisco, CA, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Virtual Ch. 759 (CNN HD)

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
1920

PIXEL HEIGHT
1080

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Us 11, Grover Norquist 10, Dana 8, Boehner 6, John Boehner 6, Debbie Wasserman Schultz 4, Obama 4, Ali 3, Unitedhealthcare 3, America 3, New York 3, Joe Biden 3, Grover 2, United States 2, Carl Levin 2, Mitch Mcconnell 2, Mcconnell 2, Hastert 2, California 2, Steve Israel 2,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  CNN    Piers Morgan Tonight    News/Business.  (2013) New.  

    January 1, 2013
    6:00 - 7:00pm PST  

6:00pm
dana, can you hear me? okay. clearly we lost dana. this is just really the beginning -- the beginning of this debate. we're going to hear even when this passes tonight, assuming it passes tonight, there's still spending cuts to be dealt with, debt to be dealt with. let's listen in on the house floor some of the debate going on now. >> towards economic growth and the kind of prosperity that we want and that the american people deserve and it will create a greater degree of certainty. we all know that uncertainty is the enemy of prosperity. and so making permanent -- >> dana is joining us again. dana, this is just -- i mean, it ends tonight but just one element of it, spending cuts and the like, that's being dealt with months from now? >> that's exactly right. a lot of kicking the can on these things. in a few months we'll see these mandatory spending cuts being dealt with.
6:01pm
that is going to happen in two months. then, of course, the debt ceiling, the nation will bump up against the debt ceiling. that really is a big reason that republicans think that they're going to move on on this. that's where they think they have their big leverage. >> we'll be back in an hour from now. piers morgan tonight starts right now. our coverage continues. breaking news tonight. you're looking live at capitol hill. the house of representatives. the house expected to vote this hour on the senate's fiscal cliff bill. and it's not an exaggeration to say that the health of america's economy may hang in the balance right now. you're going to want to stay right here and see what happens. we want to welcome our viewers in the united states and around the world. i'm wolf blitzer in for piers morgan. this is a real nail-biter we're watching, despite a threat by some republicans to add an amendment to the bill, an amendment that would have added over $300 billion in spending
6:02pm
cuts and would have forced the bill back to the senate. the house is now on the verge of simply voting up or down on the senate bill as it stands. the package would increase taxes on individuals making more than $400,000 a year and couples making more than $450,000 a year. it would also extend unemployment insurance for a year for some 2 million people. and that house vote is expected to come this hour. we're watching it very closely. let's bring in our senior congressional correspondent dana bash on capitol hill. she has the very latest on what's going on. dana, i take it they started the actual debate, the vote could be fairly soon? >> they have started the debate on the procedural issues, but i just actually am getting an e-mail right now saying that the final vote, it doesn't look like it will happen until much later, until some time between 11:15 and 11:45 eastern.
6:03pm
initially we were told in this hour, but it seems to have been pushed back. looks as though members do want to take the time to debate, to air out their concerns and perhaps their support for this, and so that's why we are, unfortunately, really going to go up to the -- go late into the night like last night. >> basically what we're talking about is the exact version that passed the senate overwhelmingly in the middle of the night, 89-8. here it is. this is the actual bill, about 150 pages that now the members of the house of representatives, democrats and republicans, they're considering. i assume, dana, that they have the votes between all the democrats, most of the democrats i suspect will vote for it. a lot of republicans will as well. although probably not a majority, a majority, as they say. but they'll probably have 217 votes necessary to pass this legislation, send it to the president for his signature.
6:04pm
>> there is confidence on both sides of the aisle that that is the case, wolf, that just like you said, that it wouldn't happen with just democrats, it wouldn't happen with just republicans. and stop the presses, there will be a bipartisan vote in congress and in the house, which we don't see a lot of on big, important and divisive issues, but it is because this is something that nobody loves because that's what compromises are, but there certainly seem to be enough house democrats, enough house republicans that they'll come together and vote on this for the simple reason that they understand that this really does matter to americans because officially, starting today, every american's taxes have gone up. they want to correct that as we've seen on press release after press release, 99% of americans to keep those in place. >> is john boehner sticking to the old rule, the denny hastert rule, that you need a majority to bring it up for a vote. if the majority is not there of
6:05pm
the republicans who are the majority in the house, he is not going to bring it up for a vote, or are they discarding that give this current crisis? >> he's never been officially wedded to that majority of the majority idea. that has certainly been his goal in most if not all of the legislation that he's brought to the floor. this and a few others have tested that goal for sure, but look, this is something that republican speakers, hastert included, starting with hastert, have wanted to do to make sure they have the support with within, to make sure that there isn't any kind of revolt, there isn't a question of their leadership. even though it has not been an easy road for john boehner, and that has been an understatement, i have not detected any real sentiment in the rank and file to have anybody but john boehner as their leader. to be honest with you, based on what boehner has gone through, it is hard to see anyone wanting that job right now. >> a tough job indeed.
6:06pm
dana standing by. let's go to our white house correspondent jessica yellin is standing by. it looks like the president is going to get a win out of this. >> yes, wolf, this is what they have been waiting for, but they're not breathing a sigh of relief yet because this is not done till it's done. but they've been watching all day, as we have. this is one time when they're essentially spectators. once this hit a snag, once it went over the house, there was really not much they could do. you know, the vice president was over there this morning talking to house democrats because they knew that ultimately, once it got to the house floor, as dana pointed out, it would be democrats who will have to pass it. he answered a lot of democratic questions and concerns there, took some 20 questions i'm told for 45 minutes, laid out exactly step by step the process by which he negotiated this and got to this point and really made the case, and i'm told by
6:07pm
multiple sources who were in the room that he was very persuasive. and the people here at the very highest levels are very confident that the democratic votes have been there all day, and they felt they would get here eventually, but it was a grueling process all day long. and hard for the white house to just sit here and watch it unfold. but the president is here at the white house at work. and ready to, if it's issue a paper statement, that might be it, come out and speak, if that's it, he's here to do it if that's what they decide to do, but yes, this will be a relief here as well once this vote happens, wolf. >> so there's a possibility that he might actually go before cameras and make a statement assuming it passes the house? >> they're not saying that, but he is here in the building, and this would be a victory. so it would compute that he could potentially speak if the vote is held in the next couple of hours, which it will be.
6:08pm
so we're waiting to see whether he speaks or issues a statement. and i'll keep you posted as soon as we know, wolf. >> so i speak as a former white house correspondent. i take it there's no full lid, as they say, over in the west wing at the white house, meaning that there's still a possibility that the tv crew are still there? >> they are still there. we have a dinner lid, which means everybody -- it's safe to go out and get dinner and nothing's going to happen. if you go out and get dinner, you won't miss something, but you can come back and there's the potential for something to happen later. so it's not all done for the day yet. so we're not going anywhere, let's put it that way. >> i wouldn't be surprised if we see the president one way or another, especially obviously if this thing passes the house of representatives, he'll come out and thank everyone and then we'll start moving on and at some point have a signing ceremony, sign it into law and get ready for the next crisis which is not going to be that far down the road. >> that's right.
6:09pm
i mean, this is a victory for the white house because it will address the tax concern. the president campaigned on this promise to raise taxes on upper income americans. it is not the same level he campaigned on. he said $250,000 and up, this is $450,000, but still the broad principle is kept. now they're going to turn and pivot and fight over how to bring down the nation's deficit. the president will have to battle with the republicans. he'll make the case that it should be between revenues and spending cuts, and we all know republicans argue it should not include revenues. and the debt ceilinging ins no going to be hit at the same time that this spending delay is hit in february. so we're going to have another titanic battle just two months from now. the big question is will the president take a little break and go to hawaii in between. we'll see, wolf. >> his family is still out there. i'm sure he'd love to head back to the state where he is born.
6:10pm
let's see what happens in the next couple of hours. jessica, don't go too far away. one house republican who said he was -- she was reluctant to support the bill, member of the house financial services committee is joining us now. congresswoman, you'll vote which way for this senate bill? >> wolf, i didn't hear your entire question, i'm sorry. >> are you going to vote in favor of the senate bill or are you going to vote against it? >> i'm a very reluctant yes, wolf, because under these circumstances which exist, this last-minute situation exists because the folks just back behind me in the senate chamber, senator reid, could not get the senate to act on any of the great bills we sent before, this is the best we can do given the senate and the white house sentiment at that point in time. it is a partial victory for the american people in terms of tax relief for 99%.
6:11pm
i'll take that at this point. >> can i assume, congresswoman, that those republicans in the house who wanted to have some amendments, some additional spending cuts added to the senate bill that you simply didn't have the 217 votes you needed to pass that kind of legislation? is that a correct assumption? >> i think that's probably a valid assumption, wolf. again everybody in the conference, we've had a lot of very thoughtful discussion, very respectful discussion across the range of opinions within what is a strong and mutually supportive conference. so there certainly is tremendous sentiment within the conference to provide more relief from spending. it is the spending that has gotten us into this predicament. and it does need to stop, but this -- i think we have concluded that this particular bill will concentrate on the tax relief to the fullest extent we can provide it, and we will
6:12pm
tackle the spending issue with all force starting tomorrow. >> you assume like i do that it will pass the house of representatives, a bipartisan majority, more than 217 votes and go to the president for his signature perhaps as early as tomorrow? >> that's what i anticipate, wolf, and i certainly will be glad to get this particular issue settled and now it's on to tackling that hideous problem that we have and we owe it to the american people to do everything we can. the president needs to lead on this. we need to have the right spending plan, the right kind of controls for the present, for the midterm and for the future. >> congresswoman, thanks very much for coming in. good luck down the road to you as well. >> thank you. happy new year. >> thank you. happy new year to you, too. going over the fiscal cliff isn't just a problem for the american economy. global markets are also watching what's going on.
6:13pm
let's bring in cnn's ali velshi. what a difference a few hours makes. it now looks like the senate-passed version will pass the house. the president will sign it into law. the fiscal cliff will be history. >> things have turned upside down about four times in the last 24 hours. 24 hours ago you and i were talking about how we have faith in humanity, then everything turned upside down. i'm keeping an eye on international markets. u.s. markets will open 24 hours from now. but asian markets are open. tokyo won't open. it has a holiday. but we see trading in hong kong and seoul open. they're both up a little bit because everybody is doing what we're doing. they think this seems hopeful. if markets had opened six hours ago, they'd probably be down thinking now what's going to happen? but now it looks hopeful that the u.s. will not go over the fiscal cliff if everything you heard from dana and jessica come to pass. for the moment international markets are cautious, they are trading just marginally higher,
6:14pm
nobody's all too worried just yet. and they have eight more hours to trade. we'll keep an eye on this. this could be quite dangerous for the global economy because of the major economies out there, america is growing the fastest. china and india are obviously growing more than two or three times the speed of the american economy, but they are just not as big. of the major economies america is the one holding things up while europe is still getting its act together. a whole lot of international concern on this right now. frankly, if they hadn't done this vote tonight, which now we're think might happen in the next two hour, you would see a very strong reaction from wall street at 9:30 in the morning. >> we'll be watching it closely with you. ali, thanks very much. our viewers may be wondering who that man speaking o ining on t of the house of representatives is, that's david dwyer. the republican congressman from california. he's getting ready to leave congress. this will be one of his last
6:15pm
acts in this current 112th congress. david dryer, a veteran member of the house winding up with a big bang. he supports this fiscal cliff senate version and he's making that clear in his remarks. we have much more on the breaking news when we come back. the last man you would think would be in favor of the senate's plan sh the anti-tax crusader grover norquist. there he is. he'll join us. if by blessed youn freaked out about money well we suddenly noticed crusader grover norquist. there he is. he'll join us. sh the anti-tax crusader grover norquist. there he is. he'll join us. g the anti-tax crusader grover norquist. there he is. he'll join us. and the clothes still weren't as clean as with tide. so we're back to tide. they're cuter in clean clothes. thanks honey yeah you suck at folding [ laughs ] [ female announcer ] one cap of tide gives you more cleaning power than 6 caps of the bargain brand. [ woman ] that's my tide, what's yours? diarrhea, gas, bloating? yes! one phillips' colon health probiotic cap each day
6:16pm
helps defend against these digestive issues with three strains of good bacteria. live the regular life. phillips'. live the regular life. let's say you want to get ahead how do you get from here... to here? at university of phoenix we're moving career planning forward so you can start figuring that out sooner. ln fact, by thinking about where want your education to lead, while you're still in school, you might find the best route... leads somewhere you weren't even looking. let's get to work. gives you 1% cash back on all purchases, plus a 50% annual bonus. and everyone likes 50% more... [ midwestern/chicago accent ] cheddar! yeah! 50 percent more [yodeling] yodel-ay-ee-oo. 50% more flash. [ southern accent ] 50 percent more taters. that's where tots come from. [ male announcer ] the capital one cash rewards card gives you 1% cash back on every purchase plus a 50% annual bonus on the cash you earn. it's the card for people who like more cash.
6:17pm
50% more spy stuff. what's in your wallet? this car is too small.
6:18pm
we're following the breaking news. we're awaiting a historic vote on the floor of the house of representatives. they're about to take up the senate-passed version of the fiscal cliff legislation that passed overwhelmingly in the senate last night 89-8 in favor, 40 republicans voting in favor including mitch mcconnell the senate republican leader. let's discuss what's about to happen on the floor of the house. joining us congresswoman debbie wasserman schultz. she's the chair of the democratic committee as well. she's got two hats. congresswoman, thanks very much for coming in. how many democrats do you think will vote in favor of this senate-passed version? >> well, i think it's hard to say. we've done a whip count.
6:19pm
and i think that we will have -- ultimately we have 193, 192 democrats currently serving in the house, one open seat. i would say we'll have upwards of 150 members voting for the bill very likely. we've got to make sure we protect the middle class. this deal, although not perfect, makes sure that taxes don't go up on 98% of americans and 97% of small businesses. a good step towards what should ultimately be a balanced deficit reduction package. >> that empty seat is jesse jackson jr. of chicago. that means that you don't need 218 votes to pass it, you need 217 vote to pass it. do you have any doubt that this legislation will be passed tonight?s to pass it. do you have any doubt that this legislation will be passed tonight? >> actually, anyone watching this, wolf, should have just taken out some stock in drama mean because the rollercoaster ride that has resulted from us
6:20pm
getting to this process really has been unfortunate and unnecessary but we're here. i'm glad to see that speaker boehner has put aside his requirements that they put a bill on the floor with the majority of the majority and we can see just exactly what a majority of the house does when it comes to making sure that we avoid tax increases on the middle class and giving some certainty to the those who really need it going into this new year. >> what do you say to the progressives, the liberals in the democratic caucus and outside groups who say this is a bad deal for the united states? the president capitulated, he caved, went up to 450,000 when he had campaigned on 250,000 being the limit for no new taxes, if you will? what do you say to those colleagues of yours who don't like this deal? >> i'm a progressive. i represent a progressive district. i say to them don't let the perfect be the enemy of the
6:21pm
good. there are things in this deal i don't like. we've been here before. we've been saying all along that a balanced deal is going to mean that we'll be supporting things that not all of us really love, but my way or the highway politics is not the right way to go. that's what we've been criticizing republicans for. so i think this is a good deal. we get the tax rate increase for first time in more than 20 years, getting republicans to the table to agree to that on more than -- people making more than $450,000 a year. we have extensions of the unemployment benefits for 2 million people. we have extensions of the employment opportunity tax credit. that's more higher education opportunities for young people. the child care tax credit, the earned income tax credit. we have a permanent fix for the amt which is another big tax break for middle class families. this is a good deal. it's not perfect, but it's a good down payment on what should be the work that we need to do to finish the job on balanced
6:22pm
approach to deficit reduction. >> debbie wasserman schultz, the congresswoman from south florida. thanks very much for coming in. >> thank you, wolf. let's get a different reaction right now. joining us a man you'd never think would have something good to say about tonight's bill, the anti-tax crusader grover norquist, president of americans for tax reform, but you agree, grover, with debbie wasserman schultz, if you were a member of the house or the senate, you'd be voting for this legislation as well? >> yes. keep in mind how much of a treat this is for the modern democratic party. the democrats have spent 12 years attacking the 2001/2003 bush tax cuts. they all voted against it. obama attacked it regularly. now they're out there helping to preserve about 84% of those tax cuts and making them permanent. the republicans and the taxpayers in this country have lived with a damocles sword over their head because the democrats so hated these tax cuts for the
6:23pm
middle class and everybody else, that they made them temporary. and they ended several times. two years ago obama let it go out for another two years. now we're getting permanency for 98, 99% of americans with the bush tax cuts and obama's presidential campaign in 2012 changed his promise from 2008. 2008 he'd never raise any tax on anyone who earned less than $200,000. 2012 he said he wouldn't raise income taxes on anyone earning less than $200,000 this year, meaning 2013. he had only promised people he would protect the middle class from income taxes for 2013. what the republicans have won with this fight is permanent protection for most americans on those taxes. >> but the reason that a lot of these conservative tea party republican types voted against
6:24pm
it or are not going to vote for it tonight and they don't like it is because for the first time republicans in effect are going along with a tax increase, a rate increase of 35% to 39.6%, 4.6% tax rate increase for those individuals making more than $400,000 a year and families making more than $450,000 a year. so in effect, they're going along with a tax hike. >> no, absolutely not. the republicans in the house and the senate have made it very clear they wanted to extend those tax cuts permanently for everybody. they voted that way in 2001, 2003, again several times this last year. the republicans are on record, all of them, that all of these tax cuts should be extended -- this is obama's pound of flesh because he won the presidential election. he's the one insisting that tacks go up. they'll take $500 billion out of
6:25pm
savings over the next decade and give it to the federal government. this is not helpful to the economy, and it will hurt the economy. remember obama is not just raising taxes on the rich right now. we're about to enter a decade where a trillion dollars is going to be taken away from the american people in higher taxes to pay for obama-care. this was passed only by democrats. it is entirely a democrat tax increase. and it includes many taxes that directly hit middle income and lower income people. so obama's tax increase is not just the top tax rates. it's people -- if you have bad health problems and you spend more than 7.5% of your adjusted gross income on out of pocket health costs, you used to be able to deduct anything above that. thanks to obama's law, obama-care, that's now 10%. so $2 million to $3 million will be taken out of people average income $53,000 a year, who are
6:26pm
lower income, middle income and sick. they're going to be paying taxes for obama-care. there's an avalanche of obama tax increases coming next year. >> i just want to point out, grover norquist, though, having said all that and everything you said, you are giving cover to those republicans who will vote in favor of the senate legislation in the next hour or two? >> they're not voting for a tax increase, they're voting to save tax cuts for as many people as they can over obama's objections. >> grover norquist would be voting with the president, would be voting with debbie wasserman schultz if in fact he were a member of the house of representatives. grover, thanks very much. by the way, i want to point out that that roll call that's going on right now -- and we'll put it up on the screen and show you the roll call that's going on. this is a procedural vote on a resolution to go forward and begin the actual debate before the official roll call takes place in the next couple hours on the senate language, the
6:27pm
senate version that passed last night overwhelmingly, but this is just a procedural vote in advance of the real vote that's coming up. i don't want our viewers to be concerned when they see the yeas and the nays present. we have a lot to follow on the breaking news. i'll speak to a democrat who says house republicans are in a state of chaos.
6:28pm
i've always had to keep my eye on her... but, i didn't always watch out for myself. with so much noise about health care... i tuned it all out. with unitedhealthcare, i get information that matters... my individual health profile. not random statistics. they even reward me for addressing my health risks. so i'm doing fine... but she's still going to give me a heart attack.
6:29pm
we're more than 78,000 people looking out for more than 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.
6:30pm
we're awaiting a vote on the floor of the house of representatives on the fiscal cliff bill, a vote that could come some time after the 11:00 p.m. eastern hour tonight. joining us is new york congressman steve israel. he's the chairman of the democratic congressional campaign committee. congressman, thanks very much for coming in. >> sure, wolf, good to be with you. >> i assume you're in favor of this senate-passed language? >> oh, i'm going to vote for it. there are things in the bill that i don't like.
6:31pm
but unlike republican, i am willing to compromise. i'm willing to inject some pragmatism and some consensus into this process rather than obstruction at every step of the way. this day has been like a new year's day television marathon of the congress of chronic chaos with roller coasters and twists and turns and fancy footwork and high drama. it's unnecessary. the american people deserve compromise and pragmatism. at the end of the day, democrats will provide the votes necessary to protect the middle class, pass this bill, move us forward. >> you agree with debber wasserman shuchultz, 150 democr will vote in favor? >> i'm interested in seeing how many votes the republicans are going to provide. they are in the majority. they do have a responsibility and accountability to the american people for voting. i want to see how many votes they provide. but at the end of the day, it will be democrats, enough democrats will vote on this in order to rescue the middle class
6:32pm
from this and move the country forward. we provided some adultd leadership and adult supervision to a process that was essentially run by children up to now. >> you say children you're talking about the speaker of the house and the majority leader? >> i'm talking about tea party republicans who continue to throw temper tantrums and delay this and refuse to move forward in the spirit of compromise. every time we move towards them, they moved away from us. at a certain point, you have to be able to take yes for an answer, especially when we're giving you what you wanted. >> you are making at least for 98% of the american people or so those bush era tax cuts, the tax cuts that went into effect in 2001/2003, you're making them permanent now. that's something that republicans always wanted. you're giving them in effect that because the democrats by and large almost unanimously opposed those tax cuts. you know there's going to be another huge battle in the next month or two when raising the debt ceiling comes up.
6:33pm
and the republicans think they're going to have the upper hand in that battle. >> well, look, i'm not interested in who has the upper hand. i'm interested in doing what needs to be done to protect the middle class, to strengthen, improve and reform medicare and social security. and frankly, as the chairman of the democratic congressional campaign committee, i'll take a battle where the republicans continue to protect special interests, oil corporation subsidies, big farm subsidies if that's the fight they want. i hope they've learned their lesson from today and the past several weeks that compromise and cooperation and pragmatism works and that obstructionism, it doesn't work for them, it doesn't work for the middle class, it doesn't work for the american people. let's get to solutions. >> you think the republican leadership, the speaker, the majority leader, some of the other leaders, they're all on the same page or are they fighting amongst themselves? >> oh, i think a good part of this has had nothing to do with an economic strategy. it's ab political strategy by
6:34pm
house republicans. this has been internecine war and they've put their own partisan interests and parochial interests ahead of those of the american people. we could have done this a week ago. the proof positive is when after rejecting the president's compromise, which is what we're very close to tonight, speaker boehner put a bill on the floor to create a $1 million trigger for tax increases and they wouldn't even pass that. so this is more about internal republican dynamics than it is moving the economy forward. thankfully we have a new congress coming in on thursday, fewer tea party extremists, and i hope that that bodes well for the american people and the new congress. because this congress that we've had up to now under this republican leadership just has not worked. >> steve israel, we'll see you in the new congress starting on thursday as well. thanks for joining us. >> thanks, wolf. let's bring in cnn contributor and "new york times"
6:35pm
columnist ross douthat. who is the big winner, who is the big loser in this fight? >> well, i mean overall the big loser, sir, is obviously the republicans because they have to swallow tax increases that they didn't want to swallow, but we've known that that was going to happen ever since barack obama was re-elected president of the united states. so given that context, given that taxes were going up no matter what, i think that republicans did a decent job of negotiating the president and senate democrats upward on the threshold for tax increases, and i think that they can walk away tonight thinking, well, if we were going to lose, you know, we lost a little -- you know, we didn't lose as badly as we could have. i was listening to the congressman. obviously he's right in many ways the republican party is dysfunctional right now. it's a defeated party. it lost the last election. it doesn't really know what it stands for. it's having to swallow policy
6:36pm
changes it didn't want to accept. given that dysfunction, i think you could make a case that john boehner has handled things fairly cleverly over the past week or so, dealing with a revolt from his right, sort of passing the buck over to the senate, letting the senate negotiate a bill and then letting his own membership basically spend the afternoon venting and then sort of coming around to what looks like will actually be the passage of the compromise that averts the scary fiscal cliff that everybody's been talking about for weeks now. so you can make a case that in terms of sort of managing the politics and sort of the internal dynamics of the house and senate, the republican leadership has done the best job they could have. >> were you surprised the president was willing to go up to $450,000 from $250,000 which he had spoken of for months and months and months during the campaign? >> well, i wasn't completely surprised because there are a lot of democrats particularly in the senate, particularly representing wealthy states like
6:37pm
new york, chuck schumer, for example, who always kind of wanted that threshold to go up a bit. americans making between, say, 100,000 and $350,000 a year living in new york, san francisco, los angeles and so on, those are actually key democratic constituents, key democratic funders and so on. so i think there's always been a bit for resistant to tax increases among democratic politicians than you'd sometimes hear. and i think that could be a problem fr the democrats down the line because in the end, if you're going to preserve the government we have in the form the democrats like, they're going to have to raise taxes on somebody besides the people they're raising taxes on tonight. >> hey, ross, thanks very much for coming in. >> sure, thanks so much, wolf. >> and coming up, i'll ask my panel of political all-stars who comes out on top in this messy chapter of american politics.
6:38pm
6:39pm
6:40pm
6:41pm
cbo has already said 3.967, in other words, $4 trillion will be added to the debt over ten years with this tax cut unless we do some spending cuts to help offset it. right now the president's still in a spending mood. we need to get him in a savings mood. >> that's republican congressman darrell issa of california. he's hammering home the republican message of spending
6:42pm
cuts above all else. the breaks news we're following is ben smit of buzz feed, carol roth radio host and maria cardona, the democratic strategist and cnn contributor and ali velshi our chief business correspondent. what do you make of this deal that looks like it's going to be a deal, the house looks like it's going to follow the senate's lead, carol, pleat go to you first. good deal or bad deal? >> well, i guess it depends on for who. for the american people i think this is a mediocre deal at best because it doesn't have a solution. i have a very hard time throwing a parade for a congress that took 13 months to get a mediocre solution that doesn't address spending, doesn't address the debt, raises taxes not only on the wealthy but i keep hearing it's not raising taxes on the middle class. that's not true. the payroll tax cut is expiring. so taxes are going up for everybody.
6:43pm
we're going to end up in a situation where we end up fighting over the debt ceiling and sequestration in two months. so maybe the market makes out okay but the american people didn't make out okay with this. >> but that payroll tax cut was always seen as a temporary measure. neither democrats nor republicans were really pushing to keep it going. >> and i agree. >> yeah, go ahead. >> i was going to say that i agree. i think it's a good thing, but i do think that we should be honest and not let the political rhetoric get in the way and be very, very clear that this is a tax hike on everybody. >> go ahead, maria. you want to respond. >> sure, absolutely. it is not a tax hike on everybody. yes, people's paychecks will go up a little bit. but we knew from the very beginning when we had the payroll tax cut that that was going to be temporary. this is a very good deal for the american people because it avoids huge tax hikes for 98% of the american families who are
6:44pm
hurting, 98% of small businesses who are also hurting. that is a very good thing for the majority of the american people tonight who now know that their taxes are not going to go up. for the long term, i agree, and the president agrees and democrats agree a lot more works needs to be done. nobody deserves a parade tonight. but we can sleep soundly that our taxes and the majority of the taxes for the american people are not going to go up. we do need to deal with spending. that was always going to be part of a grand bargain. and let's remember, the speaker boehner is the one who has actually walked away more than three times from a grand bargain with this president that would have dealt with trillions in spending. let's hope that we can get to dealing with spending and job creation. >> who is the big political winner tonight, ben? >> i think president obama played a much stronger hand in this sort of shoving match over particularly forcing republicans to go ahead and raise taxes on the rich. he won that. what he didn't get, which he wanted was kind of a clean slate
6:45pm
for the year. a big deal today, then moving forward other legislative priorities. instead he'll begin his second term fighting over taxing and spending and the same things for the last two years. >> there's going to be a whole bunch of fights, ali, coming up, including raising the dead ceiling in february or march. the president says he's not playing that game with republicans any more. but what can he do? you got to pass legislation in the senate and the house to raise the debt ceiling. hoiz the country at least technically goes into default. >> the president has to be careful to say things he's not going to do that he gets forced to do. the debt ceiling is not a sensible way of dealing with borrowing. there are other ways to do it. other countries have much more effective ways to do this. bottom line if he doesn't get an agreement on raising the debt ceiling which he hit on the 3sth of december, they can play around with this around the
6:46pm
board but if he doesn't get that increase, the government could come the a shutdown and we could be sitting around one night at 9:45 like we are now talking about that. the president is going to have to deal with that. i call that the valentine's day cliff, then we'll have the st. patrick's day cliff because they kick the sequester two months down. then we'll have a budget fight. there are going to be three fights that look very much like this one. for anybody who thinks they lost any battles tonight, we'll have three more like this. there are no particular winner in this. we have status quo and with that payroll tax holiday having expired everyone who works will see less money in their paychecks. no real winners, just who lost less today. >> if you like this fight, get ready. there will be two, three, four more fight in the next three weeks and months that will be very similar. some people calling it the new normal here in washington. everybody stay put. we have a lot more to discuss. when we come back, i'm going to ask all of you what you think
6:47pm
this big battle means for john boehner. you can watch videos and text. or you could watch the earnings report and take notes, like we're supposed to. so... can i get it? yeah. okay either of you put together the earnings report? yes, me totally. why don't you tackle the next quarter while we go to lunch. pu pu platter? yup! keep up the good work. i will keep up the good work. do more with the new samsung galaxy note ii. for a limited time get two flipcovers for the price of one. exclusively at verizon.
6:48pm
five days later, i had a massive heart attack. bayer aspirin was the first thing the emts gave me. now, i'm on a bayer aspirin regimen. [ male announcer ] be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen. [ woman ] learn from my story. before you begin an aspirin regimen. i've always had to keep my eye on her... but, i didn't always watch out for myself. with so much noise about health care... i tuned it all out. with unitedhealthcare, i get information that matters... my individual health profile. not random statistics. they even reward me for addressing my health risks. so i'm doing fine... but she's still going to give me a heart attack. we're more than 78,000 people looking out for more than 70 million americans. that's health in numbers. unitedhealthcare.
6:49pm
so we created the extraordinarily comfortable sleep number experience. a collection of innovations designed around a bed with dualair technology that allows you to adjust to the support your body needs - each of your bodies. our sleep professionals will help you find your sleep number setting. exclusively at a sleep number store. comfort individualized. save 50% on the final closeout of our silver limited edition bed plus special financing through new years day.
6:50pm
they just passed the rule on the floor of the house of representatives. so now the real debate on the senate-passed legislation can begin. there you see senator levin, the congressman from michigan, who is speaking right now. he's a democrat. carl levin's a democrat, carl levin's brother, sandra levin, member of the house of representatives.
6:51pm
we're back with our excellent panel. we expect the final vote, by the way, in about an hour or so from now, maybe a little bit more than an hour from now. but let talk about political fallout. assuming it passes, ben smith, what do you think the future for john boehner, the speaker, is? >> i think he was just overheard on the floor of the house calling tonight a nightmare for him. it's been that kind of day. but there's no challenge to his speakership. i don't think anybody wants the job. i think some people like the idea of a weakened speaker, which is what he is. his break not with the majority of members but with all members, including the democrats, was a sign of weakness. it seemed a little frayed
6:52pm
tonight. >> john baoehner is a patriot ad he thinks this vote is great for the country. he doesn't love it, the president doesn't love necessarily every aspect it have but he recognizes that a vote against the senate bill would be a disaster for millions and millions of americans whose taxes would go up rather dramatically. it could seasonnd the economy ia recession right now. so i think the speaker is doing what he thinks is the right thing to do, even if a majority of republicans don't agree with him. >> i think there are different ways you could have negotiated this and this is the olive branch strategy. i think what it comes down to is that it is the right strategy. however, it's unfortunate again that we're here 13 months later and that boehner/obama couldn't get this down, boehner/reid couldn't get this done. we had to bring in joe biden to get this done. i'm not sure anybody else wants the job so i think the job is safe for boehner but i don't think this is something that really bodes well for his
6:53pm
effectiveness, at least within the party's thought process zip think one of of t -- >> i think one of the win nerwi maria, joe biden. >> i completely agree, wolf. i think joe biden has done a spectacular job of bringing people together, but i will also say this is a win for senator mcconnell because he was part of that team that made this deal come together and he assured that the majority of republicans in the senate were going to support this deal. let's think about that. who knew that in this divided congress that we were going to be able to get a deal on the fiscal cliff where in the senate it was going to pass with the majority of republican support. and mitch mcconnell, my hat goes off to him because i don't think we expected that that was going to be the case. so i think vice president biden, as well senator mcconnell are
6:54pm
big winners in this. >> say what you will, ali, but it's nice to see so bipartisan on the senate side and now we'll see some bipartisan in the house of representatives. >> i'm very impressed. economically there are no big win exeveryboner winners, everybody is a bit of a loser. the one thing story is a guy you and i have spoken to in the last couple days, grover norquist. he's absolutely been a loser in this equation. he made everybody swear they would never ever under any circumstances ever, no matter what happened, if there was an asteroid coming to hit earth raise taxes and he signed off on this. he told you himself he would support this plan. that's very strange. i think grover norquist is trying to save face. grover norquist and others in the republican have had to give up something they said they would never give up. they're all sounding like
6:55pm
compromiser all of a sudden. >> what what does this aabout the tea party then? >>. >> this was a decision by boehner to go around the right side of his party. >> there's certainly been a rebalancing after the election. >> thanks very much. ali will be back at 11:00 p.m. eastern. we're not going away. history unfolding on the floor of the house of representatives. much more after this. ♪
6:56pm
i wish my patients could see what i see. ♪ that over time, having high cholesterol and any of these risk factors can put them at increased risk for plaque buildup in their arteries. so it's even more important to lower their cholesterol, and that's why, when diet and exercise alone aren't enough, i prescribe crestor. in a clinical trial versus lipitor, crestor got more high-risk patients' bad cholesterol to a goal of under 100. [ female announcer ] crestor is not right for everyone. like people with liver disease or women who are nursing, pregnant or may become pregnant. tell your doctor about other medicines you're taking. call your doctor right away if you have muscle pain or weakness, feel unusually tired, have loss of appetite, upper belly pain, dark urine or yellowing of skin or eyes.
6:57pm
these could be signs of rare but serious side effects. ♪ is your cholesterol at goal? talk to your doctor about crestor. [ female announcer ] if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help.
6:58pm
6:59pm
there she is, nancy pelosi, the democratic leader in the house of representatives. she support as vote in favor of the senate-passed legislation. she's making that clear on the floor of the house. we're getting ready for a vote within the next hour or so. dana bash, arguably the hardest working woman in television right now is joining us once again from the united states capitol. give us the latest, around 11:00, 11:15 is whether the roll call will take place? >> we got a little bit of good news that it might happen ie

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)